Polars

Data Processing

Airflow

Workflow Orchestration

Snowflake

Data Warehousing

Apache Kafka

Platform

DuckDB

Data Processing

Apache Spark

Data Processing

dbt

ETL

Prefect

Workflow Orchestration

Dask

Compute

Amazon S3

Storage

Dolt

Database

Prometheus

Monitoring

Dagster

Workflow Orchestration

Google Cloud Storage

Storage

Databricks

Platform

Power BI

Visualization

Apache NiFi

Data Processing

Talend

ETL

Luigi

Workflow Orchestration

Apache Flink

Compute

MinIO

Storage

CockroachDB

Database

Grafana

Monitoring

Azure Synapse Analytics

Data Warehousing

Cassandra

Database

Confluent Platform

Platform

Looker

Visualization

Apache Beam

ETL

Temporal

Workflow Orchestration

Ray

Compute

Ceph

Storage

Pandas

Data Processing

ClickHouse

Database

Datadog

Monitoring

Redshift

Data Warehousing

Hadoop Distributed File System

Storage

Azure Event Hubs

Platform

Chartio

Visualization

StreamSets Data Collector

Data Processing

AWS Glue

ETL

Flyte

Workflow Orchestration

Kubernetes

Compute

Couchbase

Database

TimescaleDB

Database

New Relic

Monitoring

Knime Analytics Platform

Data Processing

BigQuery

Data Warehousing

Snowplow

Platform

Qlik Sense

Visualization

Apache Samza

Data Processing

Stitch

ETL

Apache Oozie

Workflow Orchestration

Druid

Compute

ScyllaDB

Database

InfluxDB

Database

DataDog

Monitoring

Apache Camel

ETL

Rook

Storage

Trino

Data Processing

Looker Studio

Visualization

Apache Pulsar

Data Processing

Apache Flume

Monitoring

AWS Kinesis

Data Processing

Azure Data Factory

Data Processing

Apache Hive

Data Warehousing

PostgreSQL

Database

MySQL

Database

MongoDB

Database

Redis

Database

Apache Cassandra

Database

Google Dataflow

Data Processing

Fivetran

ETL

ELK Stack

Monitoring

Great Expectations

DataOps

Deequ

DataOps

Apache Storm

Compute

Amazon Redshift

Data Warehousing

Vertica

Database

Elastic Stack

Monitoring

Segment

Data Processing

Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage

Storage

Databricks Lakehouse Platform

Platform

Zoho Analytics

Visualization

Apache Nifi

Data Processing

Meltano

ETL

Argo Workflows

Workflow Orchestration

K3s

Compute

NetApp ONTAP

Storage

Oracle Database

Database

Splunk

Monitoring

Fauna

Database

Google BigQuery

Data Warehousing

Presto

Platform

D3.js

Visualization

Apache Drill

Data Processing

Pentaho Data Integration

ETL

Airbyte

ETL

AWS Lambda

Compute

DigitalOcean Spaces

Storage

Firebase Realtime Database

Database

Zabbix

Monitoring

Apache Iceberg

Data Lake

CouchDB

Database

OpenSearch

Platform

Chart.js

Visualization

Apache Pinot

Data Processing

Matillion

ETL

Hugging Face Workflows

Workflow Orchestration

Apache Arrow

Compute

Azure Blob Storage

Storage

SingleStore

Database

Thanos

Monitoring

Pollination

ETL

Tableau

Visualization

Apache Spark vs Ray

Apache Spark

Advantages

  • Mature ecosystem with built-in libraries for SQL, streaming, machine learning, and graph processing.
  • Well-established community support and extensive documentation.
  • Optimized for batch processing with fault-tolerant capabilities.

Ray

Advantages

  • Better support for low-latency tasks
  • More adaptable for real-time applications
  • Simpler model for handling dynamic workloads
  • Simplified programming model with actors

When to use each tool

Apache Spark

Apache Spark is ideal for processing large-scale data in batch jobs, especially in environments where you need to integrate SQL querying, machine learning, and real-time streaming. You would use Apache Spark over Ray in a scenario like analyzing a massive dataset stored in a Hadoop Cluster, where you need to perform complex queries and aggregate computations using Spark SQL, along with machine learning using MLlib.

Ray

Ray is particularly beneficial in scenarios where you need to manage complex workflows that require low-latency or real-time processing. For example, if you are building an online gaming application that requires real-time player interactions and state management, Ray's actor model can efficiently handle multiple concurrent tasks and maintain state across them, making it easier to build and scale the application compared to Spark's micro-batching model.